Tag Archives: perspective-taking

Cartooning Political and Social Issues

By: Leah Tudor

DISCLAIMER:

The following blog post details an existing lesson plan that was retrieved from the Kennedy Center Education Program webpage. The resource, originally designed by Rebecca Holden, can be found here: Cartooning Political and Social Issues.

SUPPORTING MATERIALS:

INTRODUCTION FOR EDUCATORS

Political cartoons first emerged in eighteenth-century Europe as a form of visual commentary on political events, public figures, and social issues. The popularization of Enlightenment ideas such as natural rights (life, liberty, property) and consent of the governed, coupled with increasing literacy rates and technological advancements, substantially contributed to the rise of political cartoonists such as Jame Gillray [1]. These cartoons swiftly made their way to the American colonies. In 1754, Bejamin Franklin published what is considered to be the first American political cartoon (i.e., “Join, or, Die”) [2]. Since then, cartoons have been widely used in the U.S. as a means of communicating political critique and shaping public opinion.

Political cartoons are an exceptionally valuable resource for educators, particularly those who teach Social Studies, English, or Visual Arts classes. They function as primary sources, providing direct insight into the political, social, and cultural dynamics of various historical periods (e.g., American Revolution, Gilded Age, Great Depression, World Wars etc.). Moreover, analyzing political cartoons helps students develop critical thinking skills by teaching them to examine main ideas, interpret visual rhetoric, recognize bias, and consider multiple perspectives. For Visual Arts educators, political cartoons offer a unique opportunity to explore artistic techniques, composition, and the use of symbolism, exaggeration and satire to convey meaning throughout history.

OVERVIEW

Context & Audience:

The lesson plan discussed in this blog post was developed by Rebeca Holden for the Kennedy Center’s education program in 2023. It is designed for the 6-8 grade band and is recommended for social studies or visual arts classes; however, it also has applications for English classes. The guiding question of this lesson plan is: What role do cartoons play in presenting viewpoints about political or social issues?

The 6-8 grade range is recommended for this lesson plan because it aligns with the developmental stage of students in this age bracket (~11-14). At this stage, children begin to engage in abstract reasoning and perspective-taking. This is also the period where children begin to solidify their own identities [3]. Thus, it is the ideal age to introduce critical thinking activities. Additionally, the creative component of this lesson provides students with the opportunity to express themselves and their new identities by exploring issues meaningful to them. All that said, this lesson plan can be adapted for higher grade levels by increasing the analytical rigor and including more written reflection and debate.

Learning Goals:

The lesson plan identifies the following learning objectives, noting that students will:

  • Examine the practice and art of political cartoons.
  • Discuss the U.S. Constitution’s freedom of speech.
  • Discuss the meaning of satire.
  • Examine sources to find those that provide the most relevant and accurate information.
  • Analyze examples of political cartoons, including the way an issue is exaggerated, a caricature of a person, and the use of satire.
  • Use a graphic organizer to explore viewpoints expressed through political cartoons.
  • Design and illustrate a political cartoon.
  • Present work to an audience.

The lesson plan also outlines its alignment with the following National Core Arts and Common Core State Standards:

National Core Arts Standards:

  • VA:Cr2.1.6a – Demonstrate openness in trying new ideas, materials, methods, and approaches in making works of art and design. 
  • VA:Cr2.1.7a – Demonstrate persistence in developing skills with various materials, methods, and approaches in creating works of art or design. 
  • VA:Cr2.1.8a – Demonstrate willingness to experiment, innovate, and take risks to pursue ideas, forms, and meanings that emerge in the process of artmaking or designing.

Common Core State Standards:

  • ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.7 – Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.
  • ELA-LITERACY.RI.7.7 – Compare and contrast a text to an audio, video, or multimedia version of the text, analyzing each medium’s portrayal of the subject (e.g., how the delivery of a speech affects the impact of the words).
  • ELA-LITERACY.RI.8.7 – Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using different mediums (e.g., print or digital text, video, multimedia) to present a particular topic or idea.

LESSON MATERIALS

The lesson plan draws on a diverse set of materials to support student learning. This includes slides and websites with various examples of political cartoons, a graphic organizer for creating one’s own cartoon, articles explaining related concepts (i.e., satire and freedom of speech), and videos highlighting the power of political cartoons to convey meaning and influence public discourse. Instructors will need to either have a projector for displaying the online materials or a printer to print them out. Instructors will also need to provide arts and craft materials (i.e., paper, colored pencils, markers, etc.) for the last stage of this lesson’s activity.  

Slides

Websites

 Videos

Educator Preparation & Consideration:

Teachers using this lesson plan should have a basic understanding of the U.S. Constitution, particularly the first amendment right to freedom of speech. This principle underpins students’ exploration of political cartoons as a form of expression. Moreover, while this lesson plan is intended for the 6-8 grade band, it can be adapted for higher grade levels. To meet diverse learning needs, educators can further modify how this content is delivered. For instance, static images can be supplemented with animated political cartoons to better engage auditory learners.

It is important to note that this lesson plan does not provide a set timeline for how it should be carried out. Thus, how much time spent on each step of the instructions is left to the educator’s discretion. Assuming that class periods last approximately 60-90 minutes, a potential timeline could be: Phase 1: Engage (1-2 class periods), Phase 2: Build (2-3 class periods), Phase 3: Apply (2-4 class periods), and Phase 4: Reflect (~1 class period). Depending on the desired rigor, educators can adjust this timeline to be longer or shorter.

INSTRUCTIONS

Phase 1: Engage

1. Present students with the Slideshow: Political and Social Cartoon Examples.

  • Invite them to closely examine the images and captions, then share their interpretations. Following this, identify the images as political cartoons and introduce what they are – a form of editorial art that uses caricature, current events, or public figures to communicate an opinion. 

Cartoons from Slideshow

2. Open with a discussion about the U.S. Constitution and the importance of freedom of speech.

  • Utilize the provided source on freedom of speech to guide the class discussion. Emphasize that artistic expression is one way individuals exercise this right.

3. Create a class list of ways people express their rights through free speech.

  • Brainstorm as a class and visibly record responses on a whiteboard or piece of paper. Explain to the students that they will use this information to evaluate different cartoons.

4. Extend the conversation around free speech to discuss what it does not include.

Phase 2: Build

1. Play The Power of Political Cartoons video.

  • Instruct students to listen as Matt Weurker, a cartoonist, discusses his work.
  • Following the video, guide students in reflecting on the role of political cartoons in society.
  • Consider the following questions:
    • Why are political cartoons an important part of American history and culture? 
    • What are the advantages/disadvantages of expressing opinions in simple, direct ways to represent a specific viewpoint?
    • What other ideas can be illustrated in political cartoons?

2. Present the Comparing Refugee Cartoons source.

  • Demonstrate for students how to analyze the cartoon.
  • Work together as a class to answer the comparison activity chart.
  • The activity asks students to consider the following questions:
    • What do you notice? – Make note of any details that are symbols or metaphors.
    • What issue/topic is this cartoon about?
    • What point of view/opinion/argument is represented in this cartoon?
    • What is the primary message?
    • What colors, words, and/or illustrative details help convey the cartoonist’s perspective/position on the topic?
    • What is similarabout the two cartoons?W
    • hat is differentabout the two cartoons?
    • If you could speak with the cartoonists, what questions would you ask them?

Cartoons from the Comparing Refugee Cartoons Source:

3. Separate students into pairs or small groups for next activity — Comparing Climate Change Cartoons.

  • Instruct students to complete the same comparison chart activity this time with cartoons centering the issue of climate change.

Cartoons from Comparing Climate Change Source:

4. Discuss with students what they know about stereotypes.

  • Prompt students to identify examples of stereotypes that they have seen or read.
  • Facilitate a discussion about why and how political cartoons have been used to stereotype political figures and societal problems throughout history.

5. Assign students to find additional examples of political cartoons.

6. Divide students into collaborative groups.

  • Instruct each group to select two or three cartoons to analyze from the ones they independently researched.
  • Prompt the groups to weigh the pros and cons of political cartoons while discussing following questions:
    • How are political cartoons effective or ineffective forms of free speec?h
    • How do political cartoons depict stereotypes?
    • How do illustrators use hyperbole and satire to make a point?
    • Do political depictions persuade or encourage people to take a side?
    • Why is art used to convey messages?
    • Why do cartoons remain a part of the way we are provided with news?

Phase 3: Apply

1. Introduce an “original cartoon” art project.

2. Review appropriate topics for the project and review key elements a political cartoon should contain.

  • Refer to planner for definitions of key elements:
    • Symbolism – symbols that represent ideas or qualities
    • Captions – a brief text providing an explanation
    • Labels – a word describing or clarifying objects or people
    • Irony – when you say something different from the way things are expected to be
    • Analogy – a comparison between two different things that share similar qualities or characteristics
    • Exaggeration – a dramatic representation of a physical characteristic, object, or place

3. Draw the cartoon

  • Distribute arts and craft materials for students to use (e.g., paper, markers, pencils, erasers, etc.).
  • Designate the allotted time for the project.

4. Display the cartoons around the classroom or school.

  • Encourage students to write an artist statement to go alongside their work.

Phase 4: Reflect

1. Conduct a gallery walk so students can view and discuss all the different cartoons.

  • Instruct students to carefully examine each other’s work and critically analyze the issues conveyed.
  • Have students take note of how their cartoon compares to the others.

2. Conclude with a reflective discussion or written response in which students evaluate the role of political cartoons in shaping public discourse.

  • Propose the following questions:
    • How are political cartoons an effective or ineffective method for creating interest in a political or social issue?
    • How do cartoons create interest or disinterest in a particular political or social issue? 

RELEVENCE AS A TOOL FOR PEACE EDUCATION

Connecting Learning Objectives and Pedagogies to Peace Education:

This lesson plan’s learning objectives and standards directly connect to peace education, as they aim to cultivate the same capacities that underpin peace and conflict resolution such as perspective-taking, empathy, and critical thinking. Through their analysis, students are encouraged to reflect on how media frames sociopolitical issues in ways that often are grounded in bias or perpetuate harmful stereotypes. This process pushes students to question dominant narratives and consider multiple points of view, aligning with the social awareness aspect of the Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) pedagogy [4]. This lesson also aligns with Betty Reardon’s education for peace framework, as its objectives focus on, “…[creating] some of the preconditions for the achievement of peace” [5].

Other pedagogical approaches utilized in this plan that directly align with peace education are collaborative learning, discussion-based inquiry, and arts-based exploration. Each of these approaches aim to foster dialogue and engage students thoughtfully with complex issues. This collective and artistic engagement helps students become more confident in expressing their ideas and working with others while also developing a stronger sense of civic responsibility. Moreover, the types of political cartoons examined can be adapted to address certain topics that foster intercultural understanding. For instance, political cartoons about immigrants or refugees can prompt students to consider the hardships they experience and empathize with their struggles.

ALTERNATIVE ADAPTATION

Connecting to Contemporary Contexts

To further enhance the relevance of this lesson plan, educators can incorporate contemporary political cartoons that reflect current events and public discourse. For instance, given that this lesson plan was retrieved from the Kennedy Center Education page, one possible adaption of this lesson is to include recent cartoons that engage with discussions surrounding the current administration’s decision to rename the institution the Trump-Kennedy Center. 

Adaptation in Practice:

This modification can be incorporated into Phase 2 (Build) of the lesson. For example, educators may replace or supplement the provided comparison activities with the political cartoons included below. Students can analyze these cartoons using the same guiding questions outlined in the lesson, focusing on how artists use symbolism, satire, and exaggeration to represent different viewpoints and influence public opinion. 

Educator Considerations:

When incorporating contemporary political content, educators should be mindful of maintaining a balanced and inclusive classroom environment. Discussions should remain grounded in critical analysis of visual rhetoric and evidence-based interpretation. Establishing clear expectations for respectful dialogue is essential. Moreover, since cartoons referencing the Kennedy Center’s renaming largely represent the views of one political perspective, it is important that the instructor offset this imbalance by prompting students to critically consider the question: “Whose perspective is missing and why?” In this case, the missing viewpoint is those who are supportive of the Trump administration and its decision to rename the center. To further engage in perspective-taking, the instructor could ask students to consider what a cartoon supporting the decision might look like. The purpose of this prompt is to encourage students to consider both perspectives, even if they strongly support one side over the other. This concept of perspective-taking is a foundational component of effective peace education. 

Sample Cartoons Referencing the Trump-Kennedy Center:

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

The following resources provide additional background research and classroom-based examples for effectively integrating political cartoons into teaching practice:

Perspective-Taking

Introduction for Educators

An old and well-known parable tells the story of a group of blind men and an elephant. Originating in the Indian subcontinent, many versions have evolved over time, but each telling carries the same core element:

A group of blind men encounters an unfamiliar animal – something they are told is called an elephant. Curious about the creature but unable to see its form, they resolve to learn what it is by touch. Reaching out, each man felt a different part of the animal. The first man’s hand fell on the trunk – he proclaimed that the animal must be like a thick snake. The second man’s hand reached out toward a leg, arguing instead that the elephant must be like a pillar – a tree. Another, feeling the wing-like shape of the ear, quibbled that the elephant must be like a bat, to the disagreement of the man touching the tail, who stated the elephant was rope-like. So on and so forth, each man stepped forward, felt another part of the animal, and declared its nature. Lacking knowledge of the whole picture, however, none truly knew the elephant.

The moral of the story is to problematize the truth each man arrives at with their limited perception. While their subjective experiences may be real for them, that does not constitute an objective truth of the elephant itself. To bring the story into focus with the concept of perspective-taking, in some versions, the blind men gather together to share their experiences to create a greater picture of the elephant as a whole, arriving at a shared truth. By understanding what the other participants were doing and their rationale behind it allowed them to incorporate a broader and more creative understanding of the elephant.Perspective-taking, the “active cognitive process of imagining the world from another’s vantage point or imagining oneself in another’s shoes to understand their visual viewpoint, thoughts, motivations, intentions, and/or emotions,” is a process by which we can “try on” another’s perspective. It has important implications for cognitive development, and can broadly benefit social interactions and conflict, yet it also has elements that can be problematic in groups and organizations.[1] This activity, designed for educators working with high school or college students and organizational facilitators, seeks to teach what perspective-taking is and is not, its potential benefits, and its challenges and pitfalls

[1] Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.003

Overview

Learning Goals

The goal of this workshop is to help participants:

  • Practice visual and conceptual perspective-taking to understand how to apply it in their everyday lives.
  • Understand how it can generate shared understanding and creative solutions to problems.
  • Understand some of the pitfalls of perspective-taking, including stereotyping, caricature, and preferential treatment.

Importance in Peace Education

Perspective-taking is an important element in peace education as it can help us to better understand the motivations of others as well as their worldviews on values such as justice, mercy, and equity. At its best, perspective-taking can reduce stereotyping and prejudice, improve the potential for creative solutions to conflict, and evoke empathy between adversaries in conflict. Conversely, in certain contexts, perspective-taking can increase prejudices and stereotyping, lead to preferential treatment, and deepen conflicts. Understanding how perspective-taking works, as well as the elements contributing to its positive and negative outcomes, can help individuals, leaders, and organizations navigate conflict constructively.

Target Audience

This workshop is designed for high-school-aged students and above. Aside from its use as a conceptual skill, perspective-taking is a developmental skill that children learn as they grow into adulthood. Drawing from Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, perspective-taking as a developmental skill takes shape from ages seven to twelve but improves as time goes on. Accordingly, this workshop assumes that the basic skillset of perspective-taking is already present, with the activity exploring that skill and its complexities.

Accessibility Note

Current research notes that some people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, comorbid with conduct disorders, or autism, may have difficulty engaging in perspective-taking[1]. While there is new research exploring teaching perspective-taking these populations[2], those approaches are beyond the scope of this workshop. As such, this exercise may not be suitable for groups with these individuals.

[1] See: Marton, I., Wiener, J., Rogers, M., Moore, C., & Tannock, R. (2009). Empathy and Social Perspective Taking in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9262-4 or Reed, T., & Peterson, C. (1990). A comparative study of autistic subjects’ performance at two levels of visual and cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216060

[2] Pearson, A., Ropar, D., & Hamilton, A. (2013). A review of visual perspective taking in autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00652

Timing and Phases

This workshop consists of three phases, totaling about 60-90 minutes:

  • Phase 1 (10-15 Minutes): Introduces perspective-taking as an idea through visual perspective-taking, using optical illusions and an image of a dove to bridge the visual and conceptual.
  • Phase 2 (20-30 Minutes): Engages participants in exploring their own responses to a scenario, followed by a discussion on different elements informing their perspectives.
  • Phase 3 (30-45 Minutes): Participants revisit the scenario, role-playing slight modifications to their perspectives. This is followed by discussion questions and reflection.

Recommended Group Size

This exercise can accommodate various group sizes, with more participants requiring more time for each phase. However, a minimum of 4 to 5 participants is recommended to allow for a diversity of answers.

Materials Needed

The optical illusions for the first phase are provided here, though similar interpretive illusions can be utilized for the same effect. For the second and third phases, a whiteboard and sticky notes or a virtual platform with whiteboard and sticky note capacity is ideal so that participants can see responses. However, reading the scenarios aloud and having participants write their answers themselves is also feasible. Additionally, there are two handouts found in this document that are meant to be used in Phase 2 onward.

Potential Modifications

  • Different optical illusions can be employed to give participants increased experience in visual perspective-taking. Additionally, in face-to-face settings, having students engage with a complex physical object in a circle is another way to explore visual perspective-taking.
  • In large groups, Phases 2 and 3 can be done in small groups of 5 or more people.
  • A fourth phase, exploring real-life or historical scenarios and conflicts, can be implemented using the ideas discussed in the prior phases. This can allow educators to incorporate this exercise into existing curriculum.

Additional Resources

Phase 1: Visual Perspective-Taking

The first phase of this activity seeks to ground the process of perspective-taking using a visual approach, which can provide a foundation for what the participants will engage in later in subsequent phases. Visual perspective-taking is thought to emerge before conceptual perspective-taking[1], so its process may be more familiar to participants than its conceptual counterpart.

[1] Gabbe, A., & Marquis, C. (1996). The Emergence of Visual and Conceptual Perspective-Taking Abilities in Three and Four-Year-Old Children. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6712607.v1

Process

Have students look at the following images, responding with what they see in each image.

Some possible interpretations:

  • Two fish swimming in the sea
  • A woman looking to the left

Some possible interpretations:

  • An elderly man and woman facing each other
  • A younger man and woman sitting in a landscape scene
  • A candlestick or chalice

Discussion Questions

  • What did you see in each image?
  • Do you see anything else in the image?
  • If you did not see something that someone else saw, can you adjust what you are looking at to find what they identified?
  • Why do you think you saw what you did in the images?

Lecture Notes

  • Perspective-taking is the process by which we try on a different perspective to gain greater information about the world around us.

A common way we engage in perspective-taking is visually, wherein our position in the world determines how we interpret what is there. For example, take a look at this image:

This sculpture by the artist Michael Murphy is made from a series of floating balls. From one angle, all we can see is the cone of balls. However, by standing at the right place in the room, the balls resolve into the image of an eye.

In addition to its visual dimension, perspective-taking also has a conceptual component, where we ascribe ideas, meaning, and motivation to objects and actions. For example, take a look at this sculpture, also created by Michael Murphy:

Reflection Questions

Ask the participants to reflect on the following questions quietly to themselves:

  • What do you see in this image?
  • What does this image mean to you?
  • What do you think the artist was trying to portray in this image?
  • Is there another way this image could be interpreted?

Finishing up Phase 1

  • By taking on a different perspective, we can gain new information about a situation or expand our understanding of possible interpretations.
  • Visually, this can help us make sense of scenes and images.
  • Conceptually, it can allow us to better interpret and understand the actions, motivations, and intentions.
  • In the next phase, we will explore our own interpretations of a series of scenarios, then reflect on those interpretations.

Additional Resource:

“Visual Perspective Taking” An article and YouTube video discussing different elements of visual perspective-taking.

Phase 2: Interpreting Conceptual Perspectives

The second phase of this activity explores participants’ responses to three different scenarios. In this phase, the participants are focused on reflecting on their responses, which will be revisited in the third phase as they imagine differences in their own perspectives.

Process

  • Distribute a set of sticky notes and writing utensils to each participant.
  • Prepare a whiteboard space with the scenario and provide space to allow participants to place their sticky notes on each section.
  • For each of the following scenarios, have the participants write their answers to the questions on sticky notes, then place them in the appropriate section.
  • After the participants have finished with the scenario, use the subsequent Guided Conversation sections to reflect on the answers.

Scenario

James is caught stealing from Steve’s store. Steve calls the police, but not before physically assaulting James. When the police arrive, they arrest James and send him to jail.

Have the participants use three sticky notes, writing the name of each actor in the scenario at the top (Emile, Steve, the police). Then, have them answer the following questions for each actor:

  1. Was what they did morally right? What influenced this conclusion?
  2. Why do you think the actor engaged in their particular action?
  3. What do you think was the most important factor influencing the actor’s actions?

Guided Conversation

Take five minutes to allow the participants to reflect on everyone’s responses. Then, open the discussion with the following questions:

  • Was there anything surprising about the responses?
  • Was there anything you anticipated in the responses?
  • Were there any responses you did not understand?
  • Were there any responses you disagreed with, and why?

As you progress through the reflection questions, highlight in the discussion different elements of perspectives that may come up, such as the dimensions found on the handouts found on the following pages:

Lecture and Additional Resources

When the reflection questions have been answered or time constraints require moving on, distribute the handouts to each participant and discuss how each dimension plays a part in affecting perspective-taking. The third phase will allow participants to generate their own interpretations of these handouts, with broader meaning generated in the reflection portion of the exercise. However, here are some additional resources to provide additional information on the subject:

Phase 3: Playing with Perspective

This final phase revisits the scenario in Phase 2, having participants imagine slight alterations to the situation to explore each of the dimensions listed in the first handout.

Process

Like Phase 2, a whiteboard is used alongside sticky notes to collect participants’ answers in this phase. Have participants write their answers and post them to the whiteboard for each of the four alternative scenarios. After the scenarios are explored, there is a second reflective conversation.

Scenarios

For each scenario, have the participants use three sticky notes, writing the name of each actor in the scenario at the top. Then, have them answer the following questions for each actor:

  • Was what they did morally right? What influenced this conclusion?
  • Did the change in the scenario change your previous answer? How and why?
  • What do you think is the most important factor affecting perspective in this new scenario?

Scenario 1

Emily is caught stealing from Steve’s store. Steve calls the police, but not before physically assaulting Emily. When the police arrive, they arrest Emily and send her to jail.

Scenario 2

In this scenario, imagine that you are a law enforcement officer responding to the situation. James is caught stealing from Steve’s store. Steve calls the police, but not before physically assaulting James. When the police arrive, they arrest James and send him to jail.

Scenario 3

James is caught stealing from Steve’s store. This is the fifth time Steve has caught James stealing this month. Steve calls the police, but not before physically assaulting James. When the police arrive, they arrest James and send him to jail.

Scenario 4

James, desperate to feed his family, is caught stealing food from Steve’s grocery store. Steve calls the police, but not before physically assaulting James. When the police arrive, they arrest James and send him to jail.

Reflection and Guided Conversation

After the participants have completed the scenarios and posted their sticky notes, give them five minutes to review the responses. Then, have them reflect on the following questions in a group discussion:

  • How did the answers change in each scenario? Did you notice anything surprising?
  • What dimension of perspective-taking might apply to each scenario?
  • Did you notice any stereotyping, caricature, or preferential treatment in the answers?
  • How might perspective-taking affect how you look at incidents or events in the world?
  • How might perspective-taking benefit you when dealing with conflict?
  • Are there any risks or drawbacks to engaging in perspective-taking?

Materials

core-documentDownload
slidesDownload